BUYING A CAR IN 2010
(WITHOUT HAVING HEADACHES IN 2011)
VEHICLE DESIGN SAFETY
Safety is really a subset of performance, and crash performance was discussed in the performance chapter, but, considering the numbers of cars travelling at close proximity at high speed in today’s cities, safety is of even greater importance than it has been in the past.
As technology has developed, many safety
items are being added to today’s vehicles that allow far greater survivability
than in the past, even with the same types of safety equipment. Air bags, which used to be an auto industry
joke with all their failures, are now allowing people to walk away from
accidents that they would have been killed in 30 years ago. They can save your life now, unless you are
one of those who has to taste the steering wheel when
you drive. If you sit with your chest
within eight inches of the steering wheel as you drive, the driver’s side air
bag will likely hurt you when it deploys.
The auto industry has been slow to add safety items for several reasons, including but not limited to, cost. In the late 1950s, Ford did not want the public to even think that the car might crash, so they resisted putting seat belts into their cars. To make their brakes seem better, Ford engineered the front end of their cars to dive dramatically when the brakes were applied. This caused the car to stop in a far longer distance, but the public was supposed to think that the brakes were better.
Much of the corporate safety thinking was geared to how much car manufacturers had to put into the cars to avoid costly lawsuits. It was a tradeoff between how much the car would cost to build versus what the company was going to have to pay out in legal claims and lose in bad publicity. Even though that thinking still goes on, the car manufacturers have been put on notice by the Insurance Institute that their cars will be crash tested, and the tests and findings will be published. The National Highway Transportation Safety Agency (NHTSA) should, also, be policing the safety aspects, but the politics of who is in office determines their diligence. Still, safety is now a big topic, and the manufacturers know it.
With the Ford/Firestone controversy in 2001,
many people are starting to again worry about rollovers, so a little about that
situation would be in order. The SUV
rollover problem has already been discussed, so is it just as bad with all
SUVs? Well, no. Ford already knew that their Bronco, and then
their Explorer, had rollover problems.
Their fix to the Explorer rollover problem was to lower the tire
pressure to 25 psi.
This pressure is lower than the tire manufacturers recommend for safe
function of the tires. What it does is
to lower the traction of the tires, so the tire tends to slide rather than
gripping and turning the vehicle over.
Whether or not that is a better situation is open for controversy, but
it does create a much more serious problem.
When that same vehicle is loaded to the gills for a family cross country
trip on a hot summer day, the lower tire pressure causes the tires to get much
hotter, causing much higher probability of tire failure problems. Firestone's original equipment tires, being
somewhat less than the best on the market, have been more prone to failure in
the first place. The two factors together
were just asking for accidents.
Firestone tires, kept at Firestone’s recommended tire pressure, will
probably operate adequately for the life of the tire. Explorers with other brands of tires kept at
Ford’s recommended low pressure will have greater incidence of tire failure
problems than normal. All tall, narrow
SUVs will have more rollover problems than cars.
www.safercar.gov and www.hwysafety.org have the crash safety performance of different vehicles. Please read the test results for your specific vehicle. You will find that although add on passenger restraint equipment is important, the integrity of the vehicle in a crash is of equal importance, and if a vehicle’s gas line tends to break in a crash, the air bags will probably not put out the fire.